Individual anchor failure
Where one tieback has parted, the wall bulges between the two anchors either side of it and stays in line at them. The peak of the bulge is at the failed anchor.
A wall that bulges in some places and not others is drawing you a picture of where it is still held and where it is not. Sight along the cap and the pattern is usually obvious.
What is being observed
Individual panels are pushed out of the line of the wall, creating a visible bulge between points that have stayed put.
These labels describe the failure mechanism in general. They are not a judgement about your wall, which nobody can make from a description. The point of the page is to tell you what question to get answered.
Bowing means the panel is deflecting under load beyond what it was doing when built. Deflection precedes cracking in a bending member, so a bulge that is measurable is a wall that is on the way to a horizontal crack rather than one that has merely changed shape.
Where one tieback has parted, the wall bulges between the two anchors either side of it and stays in line at them. The peak of the bulge is at the failed anchor.
Water trapped in the backfill loads the whole wall. This tends to produce general bowing along a run rather than a discrete bulge.
New fill, a deck, a driveway or stored material behind the wall increases lateral pressure locally, and the bulge appears where the load is.
A panel that has lost section to corrosion or rot deflects more under the same load. Vinyl and timber deflect visibly; concrete cracks sooner.
A wall built on a curve
The tell — Designed curves are smooth and continue through anchor positions. A structural bulge is local, peaks between restraints, and has usually widened a joint at each end of it.
Bowing that is caused by a failed anchor and has not cracked the panel is one of the more tractable seawall problems: re-anchor and the wall stops moving. Bowing that has already cracked the panel, or that is general along the run because the whole wall is overloaded, has moved past the point where anchoring alone resolves it.
This is the list to hold an inspection against. If a report on this symptom does not address these points, it has not established what it needed to establish, and any number attached to it is a number for an unknown quantity.
The inspection page sets out the six zones a full assessment covers and the published fee ranges, which conflict by roughly an order of magnitude — a gap that almost certainly reflects scope rather than region.
Straddles the repair and replacement bands
A single bulge from one failed anchor sits in the repair band. General bowing along a run is the shape of a wall approaching the replacement conversation, and that band is where the 8x spread in published Florida figures lives.
Across everything this site has collected, published Florida figures run from $25 per linear foot at the light end of repair to $1,200 per linear foot at the heavy end of replacement. That is not a pricing scale, it is a measure of how little the published material knows about any particular wall. Every figure, with its publisher and its contradictions, is on the page that band belongs to, and the range tool applies all of them to a length you enter rather than resolving them into one number.
Read carefully: A range this wide is a planning heuristic, not a prediction. Age alone does not establish condition, and a 20-year-old wall in bad soil with failed tiebacks can be in worse shape than a 45-year-old wall that has been maintained.
Seawall symptoms travel together, because most of them are stages of the same process. These are the entries most often relevant when this one is present.
The buried anchoring system that holds the top of the wall back is no longer doing so — usually inferred rather than seen.
A crack that runs side to side across the face of a panel, often near mid-height, sometimes on both sides of the wall.
The drainage holes through the wall are not running when they should be, are absent entirely, or are discharging sediment rather than clear water.
Three questions. Each one is answerable in a sentence by somebody who did the work, and unanswerable by somebody who did not — which means you do not have to evaluate the answer, only notice whether there is one.
This is not a test anyone is meant to fail. Several of these require equipment that is not on every truck, and a contractor who has not done them has not necessarily done anything wrong. The point is to know which assessment you were given before you approve a number based on it — and if the answer to any of them is an estimate rather than a measurement, that is worth knowing before the work starts rather than after.
Fourteen symptoms, laid out the same way.
Mechanism decides it, not appearance.
The unit everybody quotes and what it excludes.
The state register is public and free.