Collapse of a void created by backfill loss
The most common cause near a seawall. Soil migrated out through the wall over months or years; the surface finally lost its arch.
Florida has genuine karst sinkholes. It also has a very large number of holes near seawalls that are simply the moment a void stopped bridging, and the two get treated very differently.
What is being observed
A section of ground near the wall has dropped or opened, sometimes overnight, sometimes after heavy rain or a storm.
These labels describe the failure mechanism in general. They are not a judgement about your wall, which nobody can make from a description. The point of the page is to tell you what question to get answered.
A collapse means a cavity that had been growing invisibly reached the point where the surface could no longer span it. The cavity was there before today and the mechanism that made it is very likely still running. It is also an immediate safety matter where it is near a walkway, a deck or a pool.
The most common cause near a seawall. Soil migrated out through the wall over months or years; the surface finally lost its arch.
A cracked storm drain, pool line or utility conduit running near the wall creates its own washout, sometimes independent of the wall’s condition.
Water coming over the top of a wall lands on the backfill and takes it with it on the way back, which produces loss on the land side from a water-side event.
Real dissolution features occur in Florida, but they are not preferentially located within a few feet of seawalls, and they do not usually correlate with a specific joint.
A karst sinkhole
The tell — Location and correlation. A collapse within a few feet of the wall, aligned with a joint or penetration, and accompanied by other soft ground along the wall, is a backfill-loss collapse. A karst feature has no reason to prefer the strip of yard nearest the seawall.
If the cause is backfill loss through the wall, the repair is the same as for a void plus the closing of the escape route. What makes this symptom expensive is not the hole; it is what the hole reveals about how long the loss has been running and how much of the backfill supporting anchors and hardscape has already gone.
This is the list to hold an inspection against. If a report on this symptom does not address these points, it has not established what it needed to establish, and any number attached to it is a number for an unknown quantity.
The inspection page sets out the six zones a full assessment covers and the published fee ranges, which conflict by roughly an order of magnitude — a gap that almost certainly reflects scope rather than region.
Usually priced in the published repair band
The fill itself is a repair-band item. The cost driver is volume and access, and neither is knowable until someone has established how far the cavity runs.
Across everything this site has collected, published Florida figures run from $25 per linear foot at the light end of repair to $1,200 per linear foot at the heavy end of replacement. That is not a pricing scale, it is a measure of how little the published material knows about any particular wall. Every figure, with its publisher and its contradictions, is on the page that band belongs to, and the range tool applies all of them to a length you enter rather than resolving them into one number.
Read carefully: These are the freshwater alternative standards. They do not describe requirements for tidal shorelines in the same city.
Seawall symptoms travel together, because most of them are stages of the same process. These are the entries most often relevant when this one is present.
An open cavity in the backfill behind the wall, often found by probing, by a collapsing patch of ground, or by a rod dropping unexpectedly.
The yard behind the wall is dropping, sinking, or losing material — often in a strip parallel to the wall.
Hardscape close to the wall has dropped, cracked or tilted, often in a band running parallel to the wall.
Three questions. Each one is answerable in a sentence by somebody who did the work, and unanswerable by somebody who did not — which means you do not have to evaluate the answer, only notice whether there is one.
This is not a test anyone is meant to fail. Several of these require equipment that is not on every truck, and a contractor who has not done them has not necessarily done anything wrong. The point is to know which assessment you were given before you approve a number based on it — and if the answer to any of them is an estimate rather than a measurement, that is worth knowing before the work starts rather than after.
Fourteen symptoms, laid out the same way.
Mechanism decides it, not appearance.
The unit everybody quotes and what it excludes.
The state register is public and free.